Key issues addressed by the Endangered Species Conservation and Management Act of 1995
Create incentives to protect species and habitat
"The Endangered Species Act does not work because it discourages property owners from maintaining habitat or species on their land. They frequently act to eliminate habitat, for fear of losing use of their property to federal government regulations. This bill creates incentives to encourage property owners to host endangered species. It is better for both species and for people than the current Act."
Protect private property rights
"The federal government has determined that it is a public good to protect endangered species. However, the burden of paying for this protection has fallen on private property owners with species on their land. When federal regulations take away use of property, this bill will compensate individuals for their "contribution" to the public good."
Increase the role of state government
"The current Act places too much emphasis on command and control from the federal government. The federal agencies responsible for carrying out the Act have become arrogant and out of touch. This bill makes it easier to delegate authority to the states to implement the ESA if they choose. States will play a significant role in the listing process and in conservation planning."
Source: Rep. Richard Pombo's office
|