Subscribe to Outside Magazine
advertisement
Survival Guru

Today's Question
How do you make primitive snowshoes? answer

What should you do if you get lost driving in a snow storm? answer

Eco Adventurer

Today's Question
What is the greenest ski and snowboard on the market? answer

Can I really damage a coral reef with sunscreen while snorkeling? answer

Videos Ask Dave
  • What kind of dog will make me look manlier? answer
  • Is there a sport that safely combines my twin passions for guns and kayaks? answer
  • How come most of the world's cultures enjoy eating goat, but Americans don't? answer

Online Favorites

Special Issues

Photo Galleries

save this page print this page email this page
  • share this page

Outside Magazine, September 2008
Page:
1 2 

The Future Issue
Fight the Power (cont.)

On Thursday, MAY 22, Grayson Schaffer wrote:
You won't find any tie-dyes in our gas-powered dryer. I think Tom and I are the only journalists in America who eat local, shoot our own meat, and haven't tried to write a book about it.

On Thursday, MAY 22, Christopher Keyes wrote:
Hey, Carrot Top, I've now heard you make that joke about not writing a book 213 times. But I'll give you props for recycling.

On Thursday, MAY 22, Grayson Schaffer wrote:
Busted. But, please, people, enough with the "Look at me go back to nature" memoirs. Now where were we? Right, the chicken shack. Not the one we just moved the poultry into, the one we rent to Crazy Australian Guy ("CAG"). The heat lamps and space heaters are off, and we still can't get our real-time flow to drop below about 500 watts, even with everything turned off. Until yesterday, the casita had 1980s appliances, one of which was an improbable sink/refrigerator/stove unit. So I swapped in a gas range and a refrigerator that claimed to use $32 per year in electricity. Only one way to be sure if the new appliances took us below 500: I logged in to the InPower dashboard and walked around turning things off. Here's how it went:

758 watts to start. Man, I could be running an aluminum smelter.

Switched off the lights—about two dozen 50-watt halogen track lights. (They draw less than incandescents, although you end up using more of them.)


SCHAFFER: Worrying about whether I LEFT THE LIVING-ROOM LIGHTS ON IS A DRAIN THAT DOESN'T ADD UP AT 8¢ PER KWH. I think InPower is turning me into a pessimist.

Monster drop: 106 watts. (Hallelujah. Looks like the new appliances worked.)

Unplugged the clock radio, my sole form of wired entertainment (NPR; so predictable, I know). 72 watts.

Switched my laptop over to battery. These suckers are efficient. 69 watts.

The fridge in the main house switched itself on. 322 watts.

I throw the breaker for the fridge. Down, boy. 138 watts.

Unplugged the hallway night-light. 137 watts.

One thing left to do, though: Throw the casita breaker. (Sorry, CAG.) Unfortunately, the wireless modem is also in there, so we'll never know if the appliances were entirely responsible for those last 137 watts. What about you, Mr. iPhone? How low could you go?

On Tuesday, JUNE 3, Chris­topher Keyes wrote:
That's pretty impressive, though it sounds like you run your household like one of those hypermilers drives his car. I've been curious about how low I could go without being a scold. I didn't want to put an alarm on the fridge to prevent open-door decision making, or deprive Olive of her overhead fan on 85-degree days, or unplug my TiVo and prevent it from updating schedule changes. (After all, the new season of Mad Men is coming up. Hint: It's not on NPR.) I didn't want to be the guy that tells his mother not to use her hair dryer when she visits her granddaughter. (Though I was tempted: Hey, Mom, energy use in the Keyes household over the weekend of May 24–25 is documented by a giant swell on the InPower graph.) It's not that I haven't taken some proactive measures. Every night, I disconnect so-called phantom energy loads, but even when I unplug the TV, coffeemaker, and baby monitor (trust me, Christian, we'll hear Olive cry) and take the cell phones and iPod off their chargers, we drop from 224 watts to around 187 watts—a 37-watt swing, but nothing to shout about.

A few days ago, I even took this experiment to a place you were unwilling to go. One night, while Christian was out with friends and Olive was asleep, I started replacing the incandescent bulbs with CFLs. An hour later, I felt great: According to the dashboard, with nine lights swapped and turned on, I was using 583 fewer watts. I also felt like I was living in my high school cafeteria. Until they can make a better CFL, this is where I draw the line.

On Friday, JUNE 6, Grayson Schaffer wrote:
As someone who drives a V-8 pickup, I'll take the hypermiler remark as a compliment. It would be one thing if InPower helped me see that my rooftop Santa display was overkill. As is, though, I live in a small two-bedroom house, less than a mile from work. Trying to shave a few hundred watts worrying about whether the lights are on in the living room while I'm reading in bed is a drain that doesn't, in my book, add up to 8¢ per kWh. I know some people might scold me for laziness, but I can't help feeling deeply skeptical about any environmental maxim that begins, "If we all just …" The failing of those four words is the simplest reason that governments—oh, never mind.

Ya know, Chris, I think this InPower system is turning me into a pessimist. The numbers—510 kWh per month at the beginning, 373 now—say that I'm well below the average American's monthly usage of 920 kWh, but clearly I'm no saint of sustainability. What the hell are the people who use more than average doing, air-conditioning their tennis courts?

On Wednesday, JUNE 11, Christopher Keyes wrote:
Should I be worried about you? You're starting to sound awfully cynical. Maybe you broke down, got cable, and started watching too much Adrian Grenier on Planet Green?

I do hear what you're saying. But I've had the opposite reaction to InPower. It's given me a kind of control I've never had. In the past, I would get my energy bill and, other than the little graph displaying how the past month's use compared with the same month the previous year, I had no real measure of how I was doing—or how I could lower my bill. Now I turn off the light and the result is displayed right there on my screen. If the government used the money it spends to sponsor condescending Ad Council radio commercials and gave every household one of these gizmos, we might be getting somewhere. Saving energy would be completely voluntary, be motivated by self-interest, feel like a video game, and be rewarded with instant gratification. What's more American than that?

On Sunday, JUNE 15, Grayson Schaffer wrote:
OK, I'm back from my little time-out. That judgmental green light on the InPower box is still daring me to unplug my fridge, but I also have it to thank for confirming that the fun stuff in life happens without a remote, This American Life podcasts notwithstanding. Still, now that the chickens are grown and the tomatoes are ripening, I'm uninstalling my unit and sending it to the first reader willing to cop to snow-melting his driveway.




Page:
1 2 

 Subscribe to Outside and get a FREE Gift!
 Give the gift of Outside Magazine!
 Subscribe to Outside Online's free weekly e-mail newsletter featuring gear reviews, fitness advice, galleries, podcasts, and more.