
December 08, 2006
 Goggles or sunglasses: Which is better on the mountain?
|
Glide sunglasses (courtesy, Ryders)
|
Im a lot more comfortable in sunglasses than in goggles when skiing. But my buddies tell me that I should be wearing goggles. Are they right?
Adam
Jackson, Mississippi
Do you have a question of your own?
|
|
|
 It really depends on the time of year. During the winter months, or when its snowing or the snow is deep, its pretty clear to me that goggles are better. When its cold, they help keep part of your face warmer, for one thing, not to mention protecting your eyes from cold and flying snow. Theyre also easier to keep cleanif snow gets on the goggles, a brush with a hand usually cleans them off sufficiently so that you can see. But with glasses, oof, snow gets on both sides, and perhaps into your eyes, and youre functionally blind.
Which goggles you get is largely a function of budget. Scotts Split Six goggles ($59; www.scottusa.com) are perfectly fine and have a light orange tint that helps increase contrast when light conditions are flat. They also have an anti-fog treatment on the inner lens. Smiths Phenom Spherical Polarized Goggles ($170; www.smithsport.com), on the other end of the budget spectrum, help cut through haze and reduce glare on bright days, have dual lenses to reduce fogging, and have an excellent fit.
Come spring, glasses might be in orderthe one caveat being that goggles will always offer better eye protection should you take a tumble and ice chips, skis, and poles start to fly around. Glasses are lighter, cooler (in the temperature sense), and, well, cooler in the style sense as well. Youll want a pair that gives good coverage on bright days, so you dont get sunburned eyeballs from transient light.
Ryders Glide glasses ($39; www.ryderseyewear.com) would be a good choice for skiing. They offer 100 percent UV protection, have gradient lenses that are darker near the top, offer great coverage, and have light padding around the frames. Theyre an excellent buy. Id also recommend the Oakley Canteen ($95; www.oakley.com), which has dark amber lenses, good eye coverage and side protection, and grippy earpieces so they stay in place. And Julbos Arctic ($64) combine glacier-glass protection in a remarkably stylish package with excellent lenses, solid frames, and special vents that direct air over the lenses to reduce fogging.
Get more advice from the Gear Guy as he picks this seasons top gifts in Away.coms Holiday Gift Guide. Youll probably find a few things to put on your own wish list, too.
 |
|
|
 |

GEAR GUY FEATURES
Check out the bio of Douglas Gantenbein, aka the Gear Guy.
Readers' Mailbag: The Gear Guy digs into some of your more bizarre, obscure (and let’s face it, downright weird) posts from years gone by to see if he can make sense of it all, or if it’s just time to run up the white flag. Previous column: Beat the Cost of Gear.
The Gear Guy reports from the 2005 Outdoor Retailer summer trade fair, with his rundown of ten products to watch in 2006, plus the inside scoop on what shook down at the bi-annual gearapalooza.
|
|
 |
|
|
Many of the items reviewed by the Gear Guy can be found at REI.com. Click here to find the internet's biggest selection of outdoor gear and apparel.
|