Subscribe to Outside Magazine
advertisement
Survival Guru

Today's Question
How do you make primitive snowshoes? answer

What should you do if you get lost driving in a snow storm? answer

Eco Adventurer

Today's Question
What is the greenest ski and snowboard on the market? answer

Can I really damage a coral reef with sunscreen while snorkeling? answer

Videos Ask Dave
  • What kind of dog will make me look manlier? answer
  • Is there a sport that safely combines my twin passions for guns and kayaks? answer
  • How come most of the world's cultures enjoy eating goat, but Americans don't? answer

Online Favorites

Special Issues

Photo Galleries

save this page print this page email this page
  • share this page

Outside magazine, July 1996


Go Ahead, Dis My Kumquat


"Someone suddenly says dried apricots give you cancer, you stop eating dried apricots, and the farmer loses his shirt," huffs John Keeling of the American Farm Bureau Federation. "We're tired of people playing loose with the facts." Agribusiness's solution? Arrest the messenger. In a trend that has both journalists and scientists feeling jittery, 12 states have recently passed "food disparagement" laws that prevent citizens from insulting fruits and veggies without "sound scientific...data." Four more state legislatures are currently debating similar bills. Prompted by public hysteria over possible health risks, the laws stipulate penalties ranging from reimbursement for lost sales to jury-determined punitive damages. "This is immensely threatening, free-speech-wise," says David Bederman, a law professor who tried and failed to get a Georgia court to declare that state's law unconstitutional. "These laws are meant to intimidate people from examining our food."